![]() ![]() And, I have some perspective on the choice you face: I also get paid to edit in DaVinci Resolve and am a trained Adobe Premiere editor (though it has been a while, for reasons that will become clear…) My day job is using Final Cut Pro to earn money as a video editor, not writing reviews. Final Cut Pro Struggles with Collaboration.Final Cut Pro’s Stability: It Won’t Let You Down.Final Cut Pro’s Performance (Speed is Good).Final Cut Pro Has Some Sexy (“Advanced”) Features.Final Cut Pro Uses a “Magnetic” Timeline.Final Cut Pro Delivers the Basics of a Professional Editor.What is not great: Less acceptance in the commercial market (less paid work), depth of features (when you are ready for them), and weak collaboration tools. What is great: Useability, the magnetic timeline, price, included titles/transitions/effects, speed, and stability. It may not have as many features as its competitors, but its usability, speed, and stability make it an attractive option for many looking to make a career in video editing.įor this review, I assume you are interested in – or have basic familiarity with – video editing and are considering upgrading to a professional-level editor. The combination of these two factors makes it a natural choice for beginning editors.īut it is also good for professional editors. What sets Final Cut Pro apart is that it is relatively easy to learn, and is much cheaper than Avid or Premiere Pro. For the most part, all of these programs are equal. Final Cut Pro is a professional video editing program, comparable to Avid Media Composer, DaVinci Resolve, and Adobe Premiere Pro. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |